<body><!-- --><div id="b-navbar"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/" id="b-logo" title="Go to Blogger.com"><img src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/logobar.gif" alt="Blogger" width="80" height="24" /></a><form id="b-search" name="b-search" action="http://search.blogger.com/"><div id="b-more"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/" id="b-getorpost"><img src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_getblog.gif" alt="Get your own blog" width="112" height="15" /></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/redirect/next_blog.pyra?navBar=true" id="b-next"><img src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_nextblog.gif" alt="Next blog" width="72" height="15" /></a></div><div id="b-this"><input type="text" id="b-query" name="as_q" /><input type="hidden" name="ie" value="UTF-8" /><input type="hidden" name="ui" value="blg" /><input type="hidden" name="bl_url" value="www.gayrightswatch.com" /><input type="image" src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_search_this.gif" alt="Search This Blog" id="b-searchbtn" title="Search this blog with Google Blog Search" onclick="document.forms['b-search'].bl_url.value='www.gayrightswatch.com'" /><input type="image" src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_search_all.gif" alt="Search All Blogs" value="Search" id="b-searchallbtn" title="Search all blogs with Google Blog Search" onclick="document.forms['b-search'].bl_url.value=''" /><a href="javascript:BlogThis();" id="b-blogthis">BlogThis!</a></div></form></div><script type="text/javascript"><!-- function BlogThis() {Q='';x=document;y=window;if(x.selection) {Q=x.selection.createRange().text;} else if (y.getSelection) { Q=y.getSelection();} else if (x.getSelection) { Q=x.getSelection();}popw = y.open('http://www.blogger.com/blog_this.pyra?t=' + escape(Q) + '&u=' + escape(location.href) + '&n=' + escape(document.title),'bloggerForm','scrollbars=no,width=475,height=300,top=175,left=75,status=yes,resizable=yes');void(0);} function blogspotInit() {} --></script><script type="text/javascript"> blogspotInit();</script><div id="space-for-ie"></div>

Bodies in Salem

Friday, July 01, 2005

This is our LAST chance to get SB1000 passed out of the Senate and onto the House. It is getting way too late to the end of the session and we cannot let that happen. The gay haters will have won - yet again. The vote will happen on Wednesday. We need bodies in Salem on Wednesday morning. You only have to take like 1-2 hours off of work first thing in the AM. This will be well worth it.

Here ya go... from Basic Rights Oregon:

ACCEPT NO EXCUSES:
We Demand a Vote on SB 1000 Now!

Together, we began this legislative session with a goal to put an end to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in Oregon and protect the relationships and families of same-sex couples equally under the law.

Since then, hundreds and hundreds of Oregonians have traveled from across Oregon to rally on the capitol steps and testify in support of SB 1000 during hearing after hearing.

Nearly 20,000 individual emails, letters, faxes and personal visits have been made by you to legislators from every district in the state.

Oregon newspaperslarge and smallhave commended the courage of lawmakers who began the legislative session as champions of SB 1000 and called on the legislature take seriously their moral responsibility to make the bill the law this session.

Despite the most visible lobbying the legislature has ever seen on these issue, despite overwhelming support across the state and plenty of opportunity to pass this bill (not to mention many promises of an impending vote), MONTHS have gone by without a full vote on the Senate floor and the legislative session is rapidly coming to a close.

We still have the opportunity to pass SB 1000 this session, but only if the Senate puts and end to its stalling and puts SB 1000 to a vote immediately. We've been assured that the Senate will vote on SB 1000 Wednesday. Let's be there to hold the Senate to it's word.

Come to Salem Wednesday, July 6th!
Send a Message to the Senate:
No Excuses. No Delays. Vote on SB 1000 Now!

We'll meet from 7:15 to 8:30 AM outside the Capitol parking garages to let legislators arriving to work know that we are counting on them.
From 8:30 AM to 9:00 AM, find us in the Capitol Rotunda.

Seriously guys. This IS IT. All or nothing. The final push.

Posted by Bryan Harding

Protests at the Oregon State Capitol...

The grassroots are growing... Every morning at 7:15am people are gathering at the entrance to the parking garage where our elected officials drive into. The group is demanding that SB1000 is passed. More legislators were seen today - maybe 35-40. The response from the Senators and Representatives has overall been fantastic. There are of course some (ech hem Karen Minnis) who for example smiled and waved from their vehicles when in public she has vowed to do whatever she can to stop this bill from passing the House. Oh Karen - if the public knew your dirty little secrets.

Other responses have been as follows:
- String of Minnis, Krupf, Richardson waving energetically.
- Charles Starr, who has called gays terrorists was giving thumbs down; What a surprise!
- Sen. Maj Leader Kate Brown yelling bill status out of her window
- Shields coming by to thank us; string of legislators throughout the day thanking us for being out there.
- Betsy Johnson waving quite a lot - she's not been too energetic the other mornings
- A number of legislators have taken to yelling bill status from their vehicles
- Sen. Westlund stopped, opened the window, got off the phone and yelled "I love you guys!" and then blew us a big kiss.

JOIN THEM! Every morning at 7:15am at the entrance to the parking garage. Each day more and more people are showing up to support SB1000.

Posted by Bryan Harding

Oregon Civil unions out of committee, again, back to a full floor vote.

As some may already know, yesterday SB1000 (Civil Unions/Anti-Discrimination) was voted back out of committee and is on to a floor vote either next Wednesday or Thursday.

Our Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown needs to show some leadership right now and pass this bill. We have plenty of votes without question. It's the House we are a little bit concerned about - although it is still likely that it can be done in the House. Time for this session is running out and the House may just try to pussy foot around this and let it sit.

I was reading an article on oregonLive.com this morning about how Minority Leader Karen Minnis will not pass this through the House. Don't read too far into that. It's not as true as you think. Politics are dirty. Just rememeber that.

Posted by Bryan Harding

Oregon Civil Unions: Status Update

Thursday, June 30, 2005
For recently updated information, click here.

Anyone else wondering what the situation is in Salem with SB1000? I know I am. It seems as though there has been yet another delay on the SB1000 vote. The bill has been sent back to a committee for minor adjustments, but is expected to be ready to go very soon.

When is the floor vote?
The floor vote should happen on Wednesday or before. It's truly anyone's guess at this point (looking at the delays we've already had). I am basing this off of what I have been told by a staffer today.

If this does not happen
If the floor vote does not happen by Wednesday, then we need to stop being the passive, nice gays and lesbians and voice our opinions LOUD. I mean REALLY LOUD. I want you all to prepare to rally hard. WE WILL NOT GO DOWN WITHOUT A FIGHT. We have been trampled over too many times and we WILL NOT let it happen again without making it clear that we will never stand for this again.

IT IS JUST COMMON SENSE
No person, regardless of their sexual orientation should be fired from their job, turned away from housing, refused service, etc just because they are gay, lesbian or transgendered. It's simply bullshit. It's discrimination. It's something that Oregon should not and will not stand for.

Posted by Bryan Harding

Spain OK's Gay Marriage

Spain OKs gay marriage, defying opponents

MADRID, Spain (AP) -- Parliament legalized gay marriage Thursday, defying conservatives and clergy who opposed making traditionally Roman Catholic Spain the third country to allow same-sex unions nationwide. Jubilant gay activists blew kisses to lawmakers after the vote.

The measure passed the 350-seat Congress of Deputies by a vote of 187-147. The bill, part of the ruling Socialists' aggressive agenda for social reform, also lets gay couples adopt children and inherit each others' property.

The bill is now law. The Senate, where conservatives hold the largest number of seats, rejected the bill last week. But it is an advisory body and final say on legislation rests with the Congress of Deputies.

Opposition conservatives said they will consider challenging the law before Spain's highest tribunal, the Constitutional Court.

The Spanish Bishops Conference criticized the new law and urged resistance to it. The group said the bill, along with another passed Wednesday making it easier for Spaniards to divorce, mean that "marriage, understood as the union of a man and a woman, is no longer provided for in our laws."

"It is necessary to oppose these unfair laws through all legitimate means," the bishops said, apparently alluding to a previous call for town hall officials who oppose gay marriage to refuse to preside at such ceremonies.

After the final tally was announced, gay and lesbian activists watching from the spectator section of the ornate chamber cried, cheered, hugged, waved to lawmakers and blew them kisses.

Several members of the conservative opposition Popular Party, which was vehemently opposed to the bill, shouted: "This is a disgrace." Those in favor stood and clapped.

The Netherlands and Belgium are the only other two countries that allow gay marriage nationwide. Canada's House of Commons passed legislation Tuesday that would legalize gay marriage; its Senate is expected to pass the bill into law by the end of July.

Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero noted this in debate before the vote.

"We were not the first, but I am sure we will not be the last. After us will come many other countries, driven, ladies and gentlemen, by two unstoppable forces: freedom and equality," he told the chamber.

Zapatero said the reform of Spanish legal code simply adds one dry paragraph of legalese but means much more.

He called it "a small change in wording that means an immense change in the lives of thousands of citizens. We are not legislating, ladies and gentlemen, for remote unknown people. We are expanding opportunities for the happiness of our neighbors, our work colleagues, our friends, our relatives."

Zapatero lacks a majority in the chamber but got help from small regional-based parties that tend to be his allies.

Spanish gay couples can get married as soon as the law is published in the official government registry. This could come as early as Friday, or within two weeks at the latest, parliament's press office said.

Popular Party leader Mariano Rajoy said after the vote that Zapatero has deeply divided Spain and should have sought a consensus in parliament that recognized same-sex unions but didn't call them marriage. Rajoy said that if the vast majority of countries in the world don't accept gay marriage, including some run by Socialists, there must be a reason.

"I think the prime minister has committed a grave act of irresponsibility," Rajoy told reporters.

Beatriz Gimeno, a longtime leader of the gay rights movement in Spain, held back tears as she hugged her partner Boti after the vote.

"It is a historic day for the world's homosexuals. We have been fighting for many years," Gimeno said. "Now comes the hardest part, which is changing society's mentality."

The gay marriage bill was the boldest and most divisive initiative of the liberal social agenda Zapatero has embarked on since taking office in April 2004. Parliament overhauled Spain's 25-year-old divorce law Wednesday by letting couples end their marriage without a mandatory separation or having to state a reason, as required under the old law.

He has also pushed through legislation allowing stem-cell research and wants to loosen Spain's restrictive abortion law.

The Roman Catholic Church, which held much sway over the government just a generation ago when Gen. Francisco Franco was in power, had adamantly opposed gay marriage. In its first display of anti-government activism in 20 years, it endorsed a June 18 rally in which hundreds of thousands marched through Madrid in opposition to the bill. Some 20 bishops took part in the June 18 rally.

On Wednesday, a Catholic lay group called the Spanish Family Forum presented lawmakers with a petition bearing 600,000 signatures as a last-minute protest.

Late last year, the spokesman for the Spanish Bishops Conference, Antonio Martinez Camino said that allowing gay marriage was like "imposing a virus on society - something false that will have negative consequences for social life."

Despite the street protests in Madrid and elsewhere and the petition drive, polls suggest Spaniards supported gay marriage.

A survey released in May by pollster Instituto Opina said 62 percent of Spaniards support the government's action on this issue, and 30 percent oppose it. The poll had a margin of error of 3 percentage points. But surveys show Spaniards about evenly split over whether gay couples should be allowed to adopt children.

via AP

Maine - what are you thinking?

Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Ok - so not all of Maine. Maine was on the right track. Although they were the only state in New England that did not have an anti-discrimination policy for its GLBT citizens. Today, after a petition drive to collect 50,000 signatures to repeal the new legislation, passed in March and amends the Maine Human Rights Act making discrimination in employment, housing, credit, public accommodations and education based on sexual orientation or gender identity illegal. Common sense right? Well not to the Christian Conservative League... go figure.

The Christian Civic League which organized the petition accused the legislature and Gov. John Baldacci of attempting to subvert the will of the people.

“The very same gay rights bill that has two times been rejected by the voters,” will be on the ballot again, said Michael Heath of the Christian Civic League, predicting a fourth victory.

“We knew this day was inevitable,” said Jesse Connolly, campaign manager for Maine Won’t Discriminate, a group formed to fight the repeal attempt. “We are ready and eager for the campaign to begin.”

Baldacci, who proposed the legislation said Tuesday afternoon that his administration would fight to keep the law on the books.

“There are some in this state who want to move us backward,” Baldacci said. “Maine is the only New England state that does not offer these civil rights protections. We need to show that our doors are open to all people.”

Following the announcement today that the Christian Civic League will submit over 50,519 signatures to force a state-wide referendum on a recently passed bill to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation, Speaker of the House John Richardson issued the following statement:
"Three months ago men and women from all parts of Maine and all political parties stood together to pass landmark legislation to protect people of all sexual identities from discrimination in the workplace, in housing, lending and education. That was a proud day for Maine.

"I am not surprised by today’s announcement that Michael Health and the Christian Civic League have submitted signatures to the Secretary of State for verification that would force a referendum on that issue.

"I am also not disappointed by today’s announcement. I welcome the chance to go before the people of Maine and defend this policy. I think that this is an opportunity for Maine to join the rest of New England in saying that it is wrong to let the majority of society dictate to the minority the rights they should have.

"I hope that in the coming months we can have an open and honest debate about why the people of Maine should stand behind eliminating discrimination and support this policy."

House Majority Leader Glenn Cummings and Assistant Majority Leader Bob Duplessie issued the following statement:

“When we passed the bill, we were working to move Maine forward along with our neighboring states in New England, who have already passed laws to require equal protection regardless of sexual orientation. It was our effort to make Maine no longer unique in our state’s acceptance of bigotry.

It is disappointing that the Christian Civic League would dedicate so much time and energy toward curtailing the basic rights of others.

It is now the responsibility of the people of Maine to decide whether they support equal protection for all."


Posted by Bryan Harding

Canada: Gay Marriage Now Law

Canada has become the third country to legalise gay marriage, as parliament passed landmark legislation allowing same-sex civil unions, despite strong opposition from conservatives and religious leaders.

Although gay marriage is already legal in seven provinces, the bill now grants all same-sex couples in Canada the same legal rights as married heterosexual couples.

Go Canada!

The legislation, drafted by Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority Liberal Party Government, was expected to pass easily through the Liberal-dominated Senate and become federal law by the end of July

"We are a nation of minorities," Mr Martin said. "And in a nation of minorities, it is important that you don't cherry-pick rights. A right is a right and that is what this vote tonight is all about."

"This is a victory for Canadian values," said Alex Munter, national co-ordinator of Canadians for Equal Marriage, a group that has led the debate for the legislation.

Mr Martin, a Catholic, has said that despite anyone's personal beliefs, all Canadians should be granted the same rights to marriage.

Posted by Bryan Harding

Canada Poised To Become Third Country To Legalize Gay Marriage

Tuesday, June 28, 2005
AP: TORONTO -- Canada is set to become the third country to legalize gay marriage, with Parliament likely to pass landmark legislation Tuesday despite strong opposition from Conservatives and religious leaders.

Although gay marriage already is legal in seven provinces, the bill would grant all same-sex couples in Canada the same legal rights as those in traditional heterosexual unions. The Netherlands and Belgium already allow gay marriage.

The legislation, drafted by Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority government, needs at least 155 members of the House of Commons to gain a majority of the 308-seat House. While some of his Liberal lawmakers have said they will not back the legislation, enough allies in other parties have indicated they would support the bill when it comes to a vote.

There are an estimated 34,000 gay and lesbian couples in Canada, according to government statistics.

"I think this is going to be a proud and exciting day to be a Canadian because we are, once again, affirming to the world that we are a country that is open, inclusive and welcoming," said Alex Munter, national coordinator of Canadians for Equal Marriage, a group that has led the debate for the legislation.

"This is a victory for Canadian values." Martin, a Roman Catholic, has said that despite anyone's personal beliefs, all Canadians should be granted the same rights to marriage.

"I rise in support of a Canada in which liberties are safeguarded, rights are protected and the people of this land are treated as equals under the law," Martin told the House of Commons.

Churches have expressed concern that their clergy would be compelled by law to perform same-sex ceremonies, with couples taking them to court or human rights tribunals if refused.

The legislation, however, states that the bill only covers civil unions, not religious ones, and no clergy would be forced to perform same-sex ceremonies unless they choose to do so.

"The facts are plain: Religious leaders who preside over marriage ceremonies must and will be guided by what they believe," Martin said. "If they do not wish to celebrate marriages for same-sex couples, that is their right."

The Roman Catholic Church, the predominant Christian denomination in Canada, has vigorously opposed the legislation. "The most overlooked and disenfranchised group in the current debate about marriage is that of children," Calgary Bishop Frederick Henry said in a recent statement.

"The issue is not whether traditional marriage, as it stands, is a perfect institution, but whether society and especially children are better off with it than without. Families with both mothers and fathers are generally better for children than those with only mothers or only fathers. Biological parents usually protect and provide for their children more effectively than non-biological ones."

The debate in Canada began in December, when the Supreme Court ruled that passage of same-sex legislation would not violate the constitution.

A roster of right-wing groups under the banner Defend Marriage Canada headed to Parliament Hill on Tuesday to lobby legislators against the bill.

"I fear radical social change thrust upon a nation that is not asking for it," Charles McVety, a spokesman for Defend Marriage Canada and president of Canada Christian College, told Canadian Press.

According to most polls, a majority of Canadians supports the right for gays and lesbians to marry. In the United States, gay marriage is opposed by a majority of Americans, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll taken in November, shortly after constitutional amendments in 11 states to ban same-sex marriage were approved.

Massachusetts is the only state that allows gay marriages, although Vermont and Connecticut have approved same-sex civil unions.

Hillary trims Bush, as Condi takes Dick in hand.


Click image to view the full size version.

I got this email today from a company who did storyboards for an interactive flash animation my company did just recently. Take notice of the crown of thorns on Bush's head. Funny stuff. The people on the ground are supposed to be prisoners from the whole Abu Gharib scandal I assume. Hillary looks damn good...

To visit StoryBoards Online click here

Posted by Bryan Harding

If Civil Unions pass the Oregon Legislature...

Monday, June 27, 2005
What would/could happen as a result? Would there be a backlash from the religious right? Of course.

The question is would they dare bringing it to the ballot for the voters to decide - as they did with Measure 36? I strongly believe that they would. The only problem that they would face is that a very large majority of Oregonians support civil unions, even those Oregonians who are adamantly against same-sex marriage and voted yes on Measure 36 this past November.

I have been talking to people recently about this issue. The two people that surprised me the most are the ones that I will talk about.

First, my neighbor. A 45 year-old straight male who is a born again Christian.
We have known each other for about two years now. We get along great, though of course happen to disagree about certain issues. During the Measure 36 campaign we had many discussions. He was stuck in his ways, as was I. In the end I'm not sure if he even ended up voting for that issue at all.

One day about two weeks ago I went over there to stop by and say hello to him. I happened to be wearing my "Support SB 1000" t-shirt. He asked, "What is that?". So I went into a short explanation of both the civil unions aspect of it, as well as the Anti-discrimination part. He quickly followed by saying that he would support it... both parts of it. For some reason I was blown away. For someone who was so staunchly against gay marriage, he was so quick to support all aspects of SB1000. We have since discussed it further over dinner at their house. The word marriage was the problem for him. He whole heartedly believes that gay couples should have every right that he has.

So a week ago I was out in the backyard power washing my deck. He happened to be in his backyard planting a tree when he randomly asked me, "So what can I do to help pass SB1000?".

Next, a 50-something widow, from West Linn, whom I just met Saturday evening at a dinner party.
Surprisingly, she was very much the same as my neighbor. A born again Christian, against gay marriage and voted yes on Measure 36.

After we had all been enjoying a couple glasses of wine, my ex who was with us for dinner as well, brought up the subject of civil unions and the fact that Oregon is coming close to passing them via the state legislature. She too felt that the word marriage was too much for her. She said it's the 'civil' part of civil unions that makes her feel comfortable with that. She also brought up a story she had read about a lesbian couple that had been together for over 30 years. One of them had to be rushed to the hospital for a cancer related illness. The hospital denied her parter any sort of visitation. Her partner died soon after in the hospital - alone. She felt this was a huge injustice. She stated that she would fully support both civil unions and the statewide anti-discrimination policy.

A Possibility of another anti-gay ballot measure
If the Oregon State Legislature does in fact pass SB1000, the Oregon Family Council, 'The Defense of Marriage Coalition' and other anti-gay groups will likely attempt to bring a repeal of SB1000 to the voters in 2006. Looking at the polling data (even from the conservative Riley Research Associates) shows that Oregonians would not repeal it.

For More Information visit:
The Basic Rights Oregon Blog

Posted by Bryan Harding

Gentlemen: Dress up with 'Dickorations'

Sunday, June 26, 2005


So it's Sunday. I am posting off topic - again. "Dickorations" - a new ad campaign from Durex. Let's say it's more of a 'hands on' ad campaign. With five different outfits for your penis, you will be able to make it through the whole week without having to wear the same thing! Here are some examples...

Heading out to somewhere fancy? Try on the tux!


Be the superhero!


Be a contender. Put on your champ belt!


How about a six pack?


Maybe your penis is the king?


Visit http://www.durexdickorations.com/ for more information. Quite entertaining.

Posted by Bryan Harding