<body><!-- --><div id="b-navbar"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/" id="b-logo" title="Go to Blogger.com"><img src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/logobar.gif" alt="Blogger" width="80" height="24" /></a><form id="b-search" name="b-search" action="http://search.blogger.com/"><div id="b-more"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/" id="b-getorpost"><img src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_getblog.gif" alt="Get your own blog" width="112" height="15" /></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/redirect/next_blog.pyra?navBar=true" id="b-next"><img src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_nextblog.gif" alt="Next blog" width="72" height="15" /></a></div><div id="b-this"><input type="text" id="b-query" name="as_q" /><input type="hidden" name="ie" value="UTF-8" /><input type="hidden" name="ui" value="blg" /><input type="hidden" name="bl_url" value="www.gayrightswatch.com" /><input type="image" src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_search_this.gif" alt="Search This Blog" id="b-searchbtn" title="Search this blog with Google Blog Search" onclick="document.forms['b-search'].bl_url.value='www.gayrightswatch.com'" /><input type="image" src="http://www.blogger.com/img/navbar/3/btn_search_all.gif" alt="Search All Blogs" value="Search" id="b-searchallbtn" title="Search all blogs with Google Blog Search" onclick="document.forms['b-search'].bl_url.value=''" /><a href="javascript:BlogThis();" id="b-blogthis">BlogThis!</a></div></form></div><script type="text/javascript"><!-- function BlogThis() {Q='';x=document;y=window;if(x.selection) {Q=x.selection.createRange().text;} else if (y.getSelection) { Q=y.getSelection();} else if (x.getSelection) { Q=x.getSelection();}popw = y.open('http://www.blogger.com/blog_this.pyra?t=' + escape(Q) + '&u=' + escape(location.href) + '&n=' + escape(document.title),'bloggerForm','scrollbars=no,width=475,height=300,top=175,left=75,status=yes,resizable=yes');void(0);} function blogspotInit() {} --></script><script type="text/javascript"> blogspotInit();</script><div id="space-for-ie"></div>

The phone call came a little after 6am...

Friday, August 05, 2005
Sine Die, end of session for legislators - and our causes that we have fought so hard for were killed this session. I am in Laguna Beach, CA right now on vacation so I am going to let Basic Rights Oregon sum it up...

From the BRO Blog:
Oregon Legislature Fails to End Discrimination
Today the gavel fell ending the 2005 legislative session and we are faced with the harsh reality that the Oregon legislature did not meet its moral obligation to protect all of our State's families and make discrimination a thing of the past.

This is an outrage, pure and simple. Today, despite all of our work, all of our testimony, all of the heart and soul that we poured into the democratic process, all of the support that we garnered in both legislative chambers and -- in the end -- Karen Minnis, Speaker of the House, single handedly executed a series of mean-spirited political tricks that blocked civil unions and anti-discrimination legislation from becoming the law.

Your courage, commitment and unrelenting resolve to pass this bill did not go unnoticed. SB1000, a bill with bipartisan sponsors, passed the Senate 19-10, winning by nearly a 2 to 1 margin. We had the votes in the House to pass the bill, again with bipartisan support. Legislators heard more about SB 1000 than any other bill this session. Thousands of people contacted their representatives, and did so repeatedly. We have never had such a strong presence in Salem, and it was heard, for months and months.

But, in the end, one person stood between our state doing the right thing and doing the wrong thing, and that person, Speaker Minnis, abused her power to make sure that the wrong thing was done.

Using a complicated set of procedural maneuvers that came to be called the "Midday Massacre" of SB1000, Minnis stopped justice right in its tracks. She again thwarted democracy only a few days later by throwing out a 140 year old rule that allows legislators to extract a bill from committee and bring it to an up or down vote. She resorted to these extreme measures because she knew that YOU had built the support for this bill and if it came to a vote it would pass. Knowing that we had the support and still the bill did not pass is nothing less than frustrating, infuriating, and unfair.

Some have already said to us, "Well, what did you expect?" as though somehow we shouldn't have decided to fight if we didn't know ahead of time that we would win.

So let me just say it now, loud and clear: we expected justice, we expected fairness, and we expected equality. We still expect those things, and we will not stop expecting them, ever.

We also expected a fight, and of course we knew we might not win. "What did you expect?" presumes that if the struggle is tough, it's not worth the trouble. I believe that the opposite is true, that the most valuable things are those that are hard won.

Given how high the stakes are, it's not surprising that the fight is a fierce one. But that doesn't make this bitter pill any easier to swallow. We are now faced with the reality that this fight will be tough and long, but we will not give up no matter what.

As we move forward we will look at where we have been and what we have learned and we are just beginning an important evaluation process of this legislative campaign that includes your critical feedback and input about what we have done and where to go from here. Look for much more about that over the next month. Here, though, are two things that we've learned that I think are worth sharing:

First, it's never been clearer to me how important it is that we are involved in electoral politics. We need to build into a mighty force the BRO Equality PAC, which seeks to elect openly GLBT and pro-BRO candidates for key legislative races. We need to be not only a force for the positive, rewarding and reelecting our allies, but we need to become a force that will hold politicians who vote against us accountable for their actions. With your help, we can make Karen Minnis regret her actions in 2006!

And second, I've learned that when we lift up our voices, people do hear us. The outcome of this legislative session is utterly maddening. It is a terrible blow.

But I can't think about this experience without thinking of the more than 700 "While You Were Out" messages we delivered to Karen Minnis, or the thousands and thousands and thousands of emails and phone calls that poured into the legislature every time we sent out an alert, or the intrepid band of Salemites that stood outside the legislators' parking garage every morning for a month -- a month!!! -- holding signs and asking legislators to vote on our bill. . .not to mention the hundreds of people from every corner of this state, who waited for as long as seven hours and stood up at the hearings and testified so honestly about their lives, their words sandwiched between hideous lies and expressions of bigotry offered up by the other side.

I have so many of these scenes in my head. I know many of you do, too. We have represented ourselves well, and truthfully, and with determination.

Shame on Karen Minnis for her abuse of public trust, and for misusing our democratic process to uphold discrimination in our state.

With this defeat, we will become even more resolute. A friend of mine sent me a quote from Winston Churchill that says: "If you're going through hell, keep going." I love that! We have seen how close we can get, and it's clear that we will eventually win the equality we deserve.

But for now, it's important to acknowledge the pain of this loss, deal with it, and turn it into determination and passion, so that we can fight another day until we celebrate full equality.

In Solidarity,
Roey Thorpe, Executive Director, Basic Rights Oregon

Posted by Gay Rights Watch

House Minority Leader Jeff Merkley Stands up to Speaker Minnis for GLBT Rights

Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Democratic Minority Leader Jeff Merkley (D- Portland) stood on the floor of the House this evening at around 7:15pm standing up for the rights of gay and lesbian Oregonians. I truly wish I could have seen this. I'm not sure of all the details, but from what I hear Jeff was not happy at all. Outraged at what Speaker Minnis did today to destroy House rules - he did not hold back. He was gavelled about 4 times before either being told that his microphone would be turned off - or it was actually turned off by Speaker Minnis. He was called into Speaker Minnis' office to discuss the floor 'dispute'. Pretty intense.

So thank you Representative Merkley, for sticking up for what you believe and fighting for the rights of GLBT Oregonians. We applaud you and your efforts.

So supposedly this happened around 7:15pm this evening and there is audio from the Chambers available here. The most recent may not yet be available.

Here is an AP story as well that just came out: Civil unions bill caught up in dispute over rules

Speaker Karen Minnis Does It Yet Again.

Are we really surprised at this point that Speaker Karen Minnis, yet again, shows gays and lesbians how strong her hate is for us? For the second time this session, Speaker Minnis has pulled a fast one on fairness for Oregonians. I am wondering where the democracy has gone. Here it is from the Basic Rights Oregon blog...

SPEAKER MINNIS REWRITES RULES OF DEMOCRACY
In a second Mid-Day Massacre on fairness for all Oregonians, Speaker of the House Karen Minnis rewrote the rules of Democracy in Oregon, cementing her supreme rule over the Oregon House of Representatives and blocking a potential House vote on civil unions and anti-discrimination legislation.

This move comes just one day before the Speaker is required to assign HB 3508, the newest effort at enacting civil unions and antidiscrimination laws, to a House Committee. Once in committee, under the standard House rules, legislators could have --by majority vote -- extracted the bill from committee (bypassing the need for committee approval or the approval of the Speaker) and allow an up or down vote on the bill on the House floor.

As a result of the Speaker's outrageous move, such options are banned for the remainder of the legislative session. The rule of the Speaker now outweighs even a majority of lawmakers.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle decried the maneuver as an abuse of power:

"This move flies in the face of the will of the majority and standard parlimentary rule," said Representative Steve March (D-Portland). "This is a tyranny move and I oppose such a move. It is not appropriate to do this."

"I want to note my concern about this rule change. I am very sorry that it had to come to this," Representative Billy Dalto (R-Salem)

Represenative Mitch Greenlick (D-Portland): "This is an absolute outrage and a pure affront to the rule of the majority and the minority. As it stands now, the leadership of the House has absolute ability to stop any bill or any vote from happening."


The rewriting of the rules is a done deal, but don't let this brazen disregard for democratic principles go unnoticed!



Click here to take action via the BRO blog.


Posted by Bryan Harding

SINE DIE? Is the Legislative Session Over Today?

[UPDATE BELOW]

Rumors around the Oregon Capitol are all pointing to Sine Die being either late this evening or tomorrow. To be honest there are a lot of factors that will play into this as there are still a few items they need to deal with. Resolutions have been passed through committee - although when it will make it to the floor is anyone's guess. I'll make sure to update the blog as soon as I learn more.

After the end of the session I will provide an opinionated wrap up of what happened with our issues - or in this case, what didn't happen.

UPDATE: It's looking more like Thursday will be Sine Die for the Legislature.

Post by Bryan Harding

Please don't talk to me while I pee.

Keeping in the theme of being off topic... I have a peeve that I must vent about. When I go to use the restroom I would rather strangers don't try and make small talk. So this just happened and if you get offended easily or work for the Oregon Family Council, go ahead and close your browser now.

And so the story begins...

I went to use the restroom here at work. They got new little things in the urinals that happen to be red. No idea what they are for - it really doesn't matter. I'm there for a reason. Well this man comes in and starts to make small talk. He says, "I hate these new red things in the urinals." - I laugh to be polite. Then he says (and I am not joking)... "They make me think that there is blood in my urine". I am drying my hands at this point - in shock of what I just heard I look for a quick escape. What do you say to something like that? Then he follows that by, "and at my age you have to worry about those sorts of things". He was probably nearing 50.

So to you sir - please remember what your mother told you and do not talk to strangers... at least not in the bathroom... or at least not about something as vile as that.

Am I alone in my feelings about this? Not that I really need validation - just creeps me out.

Post by Bryan Harding

Apple Releases New Mighty Mouse. Finally.

Off topic, I just get excited about these things. Apple released the new multi-button mouse. It's about damn time. In reality there aren't any buttons though (see picture below). It's all touch sensative. I've always had to use a Logitech MX700, granted it has 9 buttons - that do get used, especially with Expose. Take a look...




So my main problems with it is that it is wired. I expect they will follow this one with a wireless version - they'll just ride the excitement wave as long as possible with the wired one.

Post by Bryan Harding

The 'Defense of Marriage Coalition' lies? Could it be?!

Monday, August 01, 2005
Mary Wendy Roberts, former Oregon labor commissioner, chimes in on an ad placed in the Oregonian by the so-called 'Defense of Marriage Coalition'.

As Oregon labor commissioner for 16 years, I enforced the state's anti-discrimination laws. Because of my extensive experience I must speak out against the misrepresentations of civil rights laws made in a recent half-page ad in The Oregonian, paid for by the Defense of Marriage Coalition.

Four "reasons" were presented to oppose Senate Bill 1000, the civil unions legislation that has passed the Senate and stalled in the House. I want to address the terribly misleading second reason the ad offers - although it's not the only one I found misleading. The coalition's statement implies that civil rights laws are only for defined minorities who then have special rights under the law. The is just not correct.

The ad claimed that SB1000 would give gays "the same minority status as African Americans." But Oregon civil rights laws do not confer "minority status" on African Americans or any other group. The ad is simply wrong and misleading and betrays either a complete ignorance of the law or a willful desire to be divisive and distort the truth. Anyone can read the laws in the public library, by going to the state civil rights division Web site or by getting a civil rights handbook from the Bureau of Labor and Industries and see this for themselves.

Oregon civil rights laws protect all Oregonians based upon sex, race, color, national origin (or descent ) or religion. No special status is awarded any particular sex, race, color, origin or religion.

The Bureau of Labor and Industries Civil Rights Division has and will accept complaints filed by a person of either sex. Likewise, the laws protect all Oregonians based upon race or color or religion regardless of whether any particular race or color is a minority or majority in this state.

SB1000 would add sexual orientation to the list, but since everyone has a sexual orientation, all Oregonians would be covered by the law and would have equal access to file complaints of unfair discrimination.

A heterosexual job applicant, for example, could not be discriminated against by a homosexual employer solely because of the applicant's sexual orientation. Currently, there is no protection under state law against such discrimination aimed at either heterosexuals or homosexuals.

In my experience, discrimination can occur against both. It can also occur based upon the perception and judgment (often wrong) about someone's sexual orientation. This discrimination would also be combated by passing SB1000.

Additionally, the advertisement's reason number 3, which is that SB1000 "violates separation of church and state by giving the courts and government the power to determine the primary purpose of the church or religious institution" is absurd on several counts. First, it does not change the current law in that respect, and second, the reason for the language is to ensure separation of church and state, not the opposite.

Current law allows an exception to prohibitions against discrimination of various kinds under certain circumstances -- such as when it is related to the primary purpose of the church or religious institution. The current law was written that way to limit the scope of discrimination laws where it might conflict with the primary purpose (i.e., religion ) of a church, synagogue, mosque or religious institution.

The civil rights laws against discrimination cannot therefore interfere when, for example, a church is selecting a minister or teacher of religious doctrines or beliefs, or morals. The church obviously can select a minister who meets their religious criteria, such as being of a specific faith, sex, marital status, age or any other qualifier.

In contrast, a church may not discriminate against a person on the basis of religion or race or sex when hiring a carpenter to make repairs on the church building because that job is not related to its primary religious function.

As readers must know, it is the courts, the judicial branch of government, that has always had the ultimate power to resolve constitutional issues. SB1000 does not change that.

I would hope readers will carefully review the facts and apply common sense when being presented with political ads, especially those that misrepresent the law.

If the ad cannot get that straight, how can you trust it to say what a proposed law would do?

Mary Wendy Roberts of Portland is a former Oregon labor commissioner.